Malawi vs Rwanda: Labor force (15-24 years), male
Labor force (15-24 years), male over time
- Malawi
- Rwanda
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 857,480 against 789,068 in Rwanda, a difference of 68,412.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Rwanda ahead.
Malawi ranks 23rd and Rwanda ranks 25th of 52 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 484,000 | 477,700 | 6,300 | Malawi |
| 2000s | 776,014 | 729,528 | 46,486 | Malawi |
| 2010s | 839,892 | 789,702 | 50,189 | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor force (15-24 years), male, Malawi or Rwanda?
- Malawi, at 857,480 against 789,068 in Rwanda as of 2011.
- What is the difference in labor force (15-24 years), male between Malawi and Rwanda?
- 68,412, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Rwanda?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2011.
- How do Malawi and Rwanda rank globally for labor force (15-24 years), male?
- Malawi ranks 23rd and Rwanda ranks 25th of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, Key Indicators of the Labour Market database, published as Labor force (15-24 years), male. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total labor force comprises people ages 15 to 24 who meet the International Labour Organization definition of the economically active population: all people who supply labor for the production of goods and services during a specified period. It includes both the employed and the unemployed. While national practices vary in the treatment of such groups as the armed forces and seasonal or part-time workers, in general the labor force includes the armed forces, the unemployed, and first-time job-seekers, but excludes homemakers and other unpaid caregivers and workers in the informal sector.