Ghana vs Zimbabwe: Labor force (15-24 years), female
Ghana
48.7%
in 2011
Zimbabwe
48.8%
in 2011
Ghana rank
18th
Zimbabwe rank
16th
Labor force (15-24 years), female over time
- Ghana
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 48.8% against 48.7% in Ghana, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ghana ahead.
Ghana ranks 18th and Zimbabwe ranks 16th of 52 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 53.1% | 47.0% | 6.1% | Ghana |
| 2000s | 49.1% | 47.9% | 1.2% | Ghana |
| 2010s | 48.7% | 48.9% | 0.1% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor force (15-24 years), female, Ghana or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 48.8% against 48.7% in Ghana as of 2011.
- What is the difference in labor force (15-24 years), female between Ghana and Zimbabwe?
- 0.1%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Zimbabwe?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2011.
- How do Ghana and Zimbabwe rank globally for labor force (15-24 years), female?
- Ghana ranks 18th and Zimbabwe ranks 16th of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Key Indicators of the Labour Market (KILM), published as Labor force (15-24 years), female (% of total labor force 15-24 years). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Labor participation rate, female (% of female population ages 15-24)