Kyrgyzstan vs Thailand: Informal employment rate
Informal employment rate over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Thailand
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 63.17 against 57.55 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 5.62.
That makes Thailand's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Thailand has been ahead every year.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 27th and Thailand ranks 25th of 81 countries.
Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 55.14 | 71.38 | 16.24 | Thailand |
| 2020s | 57.47 | 63.12 | 5.65 | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher informal employment rate, Kyrgyzstan or Thailand?
- Thailand, at 63.17 against 57.55 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in informal employment rate between Kyrgyzstan and Thailand?
- 5.62, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Thailand?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Thailand rank globally for informal employment rate?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 27th and Thailand ranks 25th of 81 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Informal employment rate (previous ILO definition - ICLS13). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. This harmonized series for informal employment is derived using the same set of criteria across countries to improve comparability. The criteria used are based on employment status, institutional sector, destination of production, bookkeeping, registration, social security contribution, places of work and size. Data disaggregated by economic activity are provided according to the latest version of the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC) available for that year. Data may have been regrouped from national classifications, which may not be strictly compatible with ISIC. For more information, refer to the Labour Force Statistics (LFS and STLFS) database description.