North Macedonia vs Serbia: Informal employment rate (previous ILO definition - ICLS13)
Informal employment rate (previous ILO definition - ICLS13) over time
- North Macedonia
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 18.68 against 11.96 in North Macedonia, a difference of 6.72.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.6 times North Macedonia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was North Macedonia ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 43rd and Serbia ranks 41st of 44 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher informal employment rate (previous ilo definition - icls13), North Macedonia or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 18.68 against 11.96 in North Macedonia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in informal employment rate (previous ilo definition - icls13) between North Macedonia and Serbia?
- 6.72, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Serbia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do North Macedonia and Serbia rank globally for informal employment rate (previous ilo definition - icls13)?
- North Macedonia ranks 43rd and Serbia ranks 41st of 44 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Informal employment rate (previous ILO definition - ICLS13) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. This harmonized series for informal employment is derived using the same set of criteria across countries to improve comparability. The criteria used are based on employment status, institutional sector, destination of production, bookkeeping, registration, social security contribution, places of work and size. Data disaggregated by economic activity are provided according to the latest version of the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC) available for that year. Data may have been regrouped from national classifications, which may not be strictly compatible with ISIC. For more information, refer to the Labour Force Statistics (LFS and STLFS) database description.