Russian Federation vs Uganda: Informal employment
Informal employment over time
- Russian Federation
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 16,978 against 14,123 in Russian Federation, a difference of 2,855.
That makes Uganda's figure about 1.2 times Russian Federation's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Uganda ahead.
Russian Federation ranks 12th and Uganda ranks 11th of 81 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Russian Federation | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 12,205 | 12,551 | 345.89 | Uganda |
| 2020s | 13,388 | 16,978 | 3,589 | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher informal employment, Russian Federation or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 16,978 against 14,123 in Russian Federation as of 2021.
- What is the difference in informal employment between Russian Federation and Uganda?
- 2,855, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Uganda?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Russian Federation and Uganda rank globally for informal employment?
- Russian Federation ranks 12th and Uganda ranks 11th of 81 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Informal employment (previous ILO definition - ICLS13). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. This harmonized series for informal employment is derived using the same set of criteria across countries to improve comparability. The criteria used are based on employment status, institutional sector, destination of production, bookkeeping, registration, social security contribution, places of work and size. Data disaggregated by occupation are provided according to the latest version of the International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO). Data may have been regrouped from the national classifications, which may not be strictly compatible with ISCO. For more information, refer to the Labour Force Statistics (LFS and STLFS) database description.