Finland vs Hungary: Informal employment
Informal employment over time
- Finland
- Hungary
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 37.73 against 34.62 in Finland, a difference of 3.11.
That makes Hungary's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Hungary ahead.
Finland ranks 74th and Hungary ranks 72nd of 81 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and Hungary in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 195.68 | 422.83 | 227.15 | Hungary |
| 2010s | 178.04 | 282.9 | 104.86 | Hungary |
| 2020s | 135.48 | 37.73 | 97.75 | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher informal employment, Finland or Hungary?
- Hungary, at 37.73 against 34.62 in Finland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in informal employment between Finland and Hungary?
- 3.11, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Hungary?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do Finland and Hungary rank globally for informal employment?
- Finland ranks 74th and Hungary ranks 72nd of 81 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Informal employment (previous ILO definition - ICLS13). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. This harmonized series for informal employment is derived using the same set of criteria across countries to improve comparability. The criteria used are based on employment status, institutional sector, destination of production, bookkeeping, registration, social security contribution, places of work and size. Data disaggregated by occupation are provided according to the latest version of the International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO). Data may have been regrouped from the national classifications, which may not be strictly compatible with ISCO. For more information, refer to the Labour Force Statistics (LFS and STLFS) database description.