Dominican Republic vs Zimbabwe: Informal employment
Informal employment over time
- Dominican Republic
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 4,236 against 2,750 in Dominican Republic, a difference of 1,486.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.5 times Dominican Republic's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Dominican Republic ranks 30th and Zimbabwe ranks 27th of 81 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2,274 | 4,814 | 2,540 | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 2,672 | 4,638 | 1,966 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher informal employment, Dominican Republic or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 4,236 against 2,750 in Dominican Republic as of 2024.
- What is the difference in informal employment between Dominican Republic and Zimbabwe?
- 1,486, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Zimbabwe?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2024.
- How do Dominican Republic and Zimbabwe rank globally for informal employment?
- Dominican Republic ranks 30th and Zimbabwe ranks 27th of 81 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Informal employment (previous ILO definition - ICLS13). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. This harmonized series for informal employment is derived using the same set of criteria across countries to improve comparability. The criteria used are based on employment status, institutional sector, destination of production, bookkeeping, registration, social security contribution, places of work and size. Data disaggregated by occupation are provided according to the latest version of the International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO). Data may have been regrouped from the national classifications, which may not be strictly compatible with ISCO. For more information, refer to the Labour Force Statistics (LFS and STLFS) database description.