Cyprus vs Iceland: Informal employment
Informal employment over time
- Cyprus
- Iceland
How they compare
Cyprus currently reports 14.17 against 3.46 in Iceland, a difference of 10.71.
That makes Cyprus's figure about 4.1 times Iceland's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Cyprus has been ahead every year.
Cyprus ranks 79th and Iceland ranks 81st of 81 countries.
Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 54.69 | 6.07 | 48.62 | Cyprus |
| 2010s | 45.37 | 3.32 | 42.04 | Cyprus |
| 2020s | 42.01 | 3.46 | 38.55 | Cyprus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher informal employment, Cyprus or Iceland?
- Cyprus, at 14.17 against 3.46 in Iceland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in informal employment between Cyprus and Iceland?
- 10.71, with Cyprus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Iceland?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do Cyprus and Iceland rank globally for informal employment?
- Cyprus ranks 79th and Iceland ranks 81st of 81 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Informal employment (previous ILO definition - ICLS13). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. This harmonized series for informal employment is derived using the same set of criteria across countries to improve comparability. The criteria used are based on employment status, institutional sector, destination of production, bookkeeping, registration, social security contribution, places of work and size. Data disaggregated by occupation are provided according to the latest version of the International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO). Data may have been regrouped from the national classifications, which may not be strictly compatible with ISCO. For more information, refer to the Labour Force Statistics (LFS and STLFS) database description.