Croatia vs Namibia: Informal employment
Informal employment over time
- Croatia
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 402.1 against 243.9 in Croatia, a difference of 158.2.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.6 times Croatia's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Croatia ranks 52nd and Namibia ranks 50th of 81 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher informal employment, Croatia or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 402.1 against 243.9 in Croatia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in informal employment between Croatia and Namibia?
- 158.2, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Namibia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2018.
- How do Croatia and Namibia rank globally for informal employment?
- Croatia ranks 52nd and Namibia ranks 50th of 81 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Informal employment (previous ILO definition - ICLS13). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. This harmonized series for informal employment is derived using the same set of criteria across countries to improve comparability. The criteria used are based on employment status, institutional sector, destination of production, bookkeeping, registration, social security contribution, places of work and size. Data disaggregated by occupation are provided according to the latest version of the International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO). Data may have been regrouped from the national classifications, which may not be strictly compatible with ISCO. For more information, refer to the Labour Force Statistics (LFS and STLFS) database description.