Chile vs Honduras: Informal employment
Informal employment over time
- Chile
- Honduras
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 3,030 against 2,483 in Chile, a difference of 547.
That makes Honduras's figure about 1.2 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 31st and Honduras ranks 29th of 81 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher informal employment, Chile or Honduras?
- Honduras, at 3,030 against 2,483 in Chile as of 2017.
- What is the difference in informal employment between Chile and Honduras?
- 547, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Honduras?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2017.
- How do Chile and Honduras rank globally for informal employment?
- Chile ranks 31st and Honduras ranks 29th of 81 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Informal employment (previous ILO definition - ICLS13). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. This harmonized series for informal employment is derived using the same set of criteria across countries to improve comparability. The criteria used are based on employment status, institutional sector, destination of production, bookkeeping, registration, social security contribution, places of work and size. Data disaggregated by occupation are provided according to the latest version of the International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO). Data may have been regrouped from the national classifications, which may not be strictly compatible with ISCO. For more information, refer to the Labour Force Statistics (LFS and STLFS) database description.