Botswana vs Mongolia: Informal employment
Informal employment over time
- Botswana
- Mongolia
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 651.5 against 509.42 in Mongolia, a difference of 142.08.
That makes Botswana's figure about 1.3 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 45th and Mongolia ranks 48th of 81 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 501 | 495.47 | 5.54 | Botswana |
| 2010s | 578.21 | 609.52 | 31.31 | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 622.39 | 561.49 | 60.91 | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher informal employment, Botswana or Mongolia?
- Botswana, at 651.5 against 509.42 in Mongolia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in informal employment between Botswana and Mongolia?
- 142.08, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Mongolia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Botswana and Mongolia rank globally for informal employment?
- Botswana ranks 45th and Mongolia ranks 48th of 81 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Informal employment (previous ILO definition - ICLS13). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. This harmonized series for informal employment is derived using the same set of criteria across countries to improve comparability. The criteria used are based on employment status, institutional sector, destination of production, bookkeeping, registration, social security contribution, places of work and size. Data disaggregated by occupation are provided according to the latest version of the International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO). Data may have been regrouped from the national classifications, which may not be strictly compatible with ISCO. For more information, refer to the Labour Force Statistics (LFS and STLFS) database description.