Guatemala vs Rwanda: Informal employment (previous ILO definition - ICLS13)
Informal employment (previous ILO definition - ICLS13) over time
- Guatemala
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 5,779 against 5,758 in Guatemala, a difference of 21.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Guatemala has been ahead every year.
Guatemala ranks 19th and Rwanda ranks 18th of 44 countries.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 5,464 | 3,213 | 2,252 | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 5,930 | 3,814 | 2,115 | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher informal employment (previous ilo definition - icls13), Guatemala or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 5,779 against 5,758 in Guatemala as of 2025.
- What is the difference in informal employment (previous ilo definition - icls13) between Guatemala and Rwanda?
- 21, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Rwanda?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2024.
- How do Guatemala and Rwanda rank globally for informal employment (previous ilo definition - icls13)?
- Guatemala ranks 19th and Rwanda ranks 18th of 44 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Informal employment (previous ILO definition - ICLS13) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. This harmonized series for informal employment is derived using the same set of criteria across countries to improve comparability. The criteria used are based on employment status, institutional sector, destination of production, bookkeeping, registration, social security contribution, places of work and size. For more information, refer to the Labour Force Statistics (LFS and STLFS) database description.