Moldova vs Panama: Informal employment (% of total agricultural employment)
Informal employment (% of total agricultural employment) over time
- Moldova
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 92.2% against 62.0% in Moldova, a difference of 30.2%.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.5 times Moldova's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Panama has been ahead every year.
Moldova ranks 14th and Panama ranks 11th of 44 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Moldova | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 66.1% | 87.9% | 21.8% | Panama |
| 2020s | 64.4% | 90.5% | 26.1% | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher informal employment, Moldova or Panama?
- Panama, at 92.2% against 62.0% in Moldova as of 2025.
- What is the difference in informal employment between Moldova and Panama?
- 30.2%, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Panama?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2025.
- How do Moldova and Panama rank globally for informal employment?
- Moldova ranks 14th and Panama ranks 11th of 44 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Labour Force Statistics database (LFS), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Informal employment (% of total agricultural employment). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This indicator shows the share of workers at working age in informal employment in agricultural activities out of total employment in agricultural activities, expressed as a percentage. Informal employment comprises persons whose main or secondary jobs are informal. For own-account workers and employers, informality is determined by enterprise characteristics (unincorporated, market-based, and unregistered); for contributing family workers, it is determined by the absence of written contracts and lack of coverage under labor legislation; and for employees, it is determined by whether the employment relationship is not subject to national labor legislation, income taxation, or social protection. The data are based on the statistical standards adopted by the 19th International Conference of Labour Statisticians (ICLS).