Hungary vs Lithuania: Informal employment, male
Informal employment, male over time
- Hungary
- Lithuania
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 37.1% against 36.0% in Lithuania, a difference of 1.1%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Hungary ahead.
Hungary ranks 22nd and Lithuania ranks 23rd of 44 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 1 and Lithuania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 23.0% | 25.8% | 2.8% | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 37.1% | 28.9% | 8.2% | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher informal employment, male, Hungary or Lithuania?
- Hungary, at 37.1% against 36.0% in Lithuania as of 2020.
- What is the difference in informal employment, male between Hungary and Lithuania?
- 1.1%, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Lithuania?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2020.
- How do Hungary and Lithuania rank globally for informal employment, male?
- Hungary ranks 22nd and Lithuania ranks 23rd of 44 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Labour Force Statistics database (LFS), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Informal employment, male (% of total male agricultural employment). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This indicator shows the share of workers at working age in informal employment in agricultural activities out of total employment in agricultural activities, expressed as a percentage. Informal employment comprises persons whose main or secondary jobs are informal. For own-account workers and employers, informality is determined by enterprise characteristics (unincorporated, market-based, and unregistered); for contributing family workers, it is determined by the absence of written contracts and lack of coverage under labor legislation; and for employees, it is determined by whether the employment relationship is not subject to national labor legislation, income taxation, or social protection. The data are based on the statistical standards adopted by the 19th International Conference of Labour Statisticians (ICLS).