Lithuania vs Norway: Informal employment, female
Informal employment, female over time
- Lithuania
- Norway
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 26.6% against 23.1% in Norway, a difference of 3.5%.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.2 times Norway's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 25th and Norway ranks 26th of 41 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 50.3% | 34.4% | 16.0% | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 45.7% | 23.1% | 22.6% | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher informal employment, female, Lithuania or Norway?
- Lithuania, at 26.6% against 23.1% in Norway as of 2024.
- What is the difference in informal employment, female between Lithuania and Norway?
- 3.5%, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Norway?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2020.
- How do Lithuania and Norway rank globally for informal employment, female?
- Lithuania ranks 25th and Norway ranks 26th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Labour Force Statistics database (LFS), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Informal employment, female (% of total female agricultural employment). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This indicator shows the share of workers at working age in informal employment in agricultural activities out of total employment in agricultural activities, expressed as a percentage. Informal employment comprises persons whose main or secondary jobs are informal. For own-account workers and employers, informality is determined by enterprise characteristics (unincorporated, market-based, and unregistered); for contributing family workers, it is determined by the absence of written contracts and lack of coverage under labor legislation; and for employees, it is determined by whether the employment relationship is not subject to national labor legislation, income taxation, or social protection. The data are based on the statistical standards adopted by the 19th International Conference of Labour Statisticians (ICLS).