Armenia vs Mongolia: Informal employment (current ILO definition - ICLS19)
Informal employment (current ILO definition - ICLS19) over time
- Armenia
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 500.48 against 376.73 in Armenia, a difference of 123.75.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.3 times Armenia's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 22nd and Mongolia ranks 20th of 47 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 422.39 | 546.87 | 124.47 | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 392.97 | 525.98 | 133.01 | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher informal employment (current ilo definition - icls19), Armenia or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 500.48 against 376.73 in Armenia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in informal employment (current ilo definition - icls19) between Armenia and Mongolia?
- 123.75, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Mongolia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2024.
- How do Armenia and Mongolia rank globally for informal employment (current ilo definition - icls19)?
- Armenia ranks 22nd and Mongolia ranks 20th of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Informal employment (current ILO definition - ICLS19) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series includes only countries for which the 19th ICLS definitions are applied. This harmonized series for informal employment is derived using the same set of criteria across countries to improve comparability. The criteria used are based on employment status, institutional sector, destination of production, bookkeeping, registration, social security contribution, places of work and size. For more information, refer to the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database description.