Mongolia vs Türkiye: Informal care employment rate
Informal care employment rate over time
- Mongolia
- Türkiye
How they compare
Türkiye currently reports 14.68 against 4.88 in Mongolia, a difference of 9.8.
That makes Türkiye's figure about 3.0 times Mongolia's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Türkiye has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 40th and Türkiye ranks 37th of 43 countries.
Türkiye has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4.14 | 16.04 | 11.9 | Türkiye |
| 2020s | 3.2 | 15.83 | 12.62 | Türkiye |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher informal care employment rate, Mongolia or Türkiye?
- Türkiye, at 14.68 against 4.88 in Mongolia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in informal care employment rate between Mongolia and Türkiye?
- 9.8, with Türkiye ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Türkiye?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
- How do Mongolia and Türkiye rank globally for informal care employment rate?
- Mongolia ranks 40th and Türkiye ranks 37th of 43 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Informal care employment rate (previous ILO definition - ICLS13). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. This harmonized series for informal employment is derived using the same set of criteria across countries to improve comparability. The criteria used are based on employment status, institutional sector, destination of production, bookkeeping, registration, social security contribution, places of work and size. For more information, refer to the Worker and Sector Profiles (PROF) database description.