Kyrgyzstan vs Vietnam: Informal care employment rate (previous ILO definition - ICLS13)
Informal care employment rate (previous ILO definition - ICLS13) over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Vietnam
How they compare
Vietnam currently reports 17.28 against 12.11 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 5.17.
That makes Vietnam's figure about 1.4 times Kyrgyzstan's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Vietnam has been ahead every year.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 38th and Vietnam ranks 36th of 43 countries.
Vietnam has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Vietnam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 15.89 | 17.99 | 2.11 | Vietnam |
| 2020s | 13.19 | 17.47 | 4.28 | Vietnam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher informal care employment rate, Kyrgyzstan or Vietnam?
- Vietnam, at 17.28 against 12.11 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in informal care employment rate between Kyrgyzstan and Vietnam?
- 5.17, with Vietnam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Vietnam?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2023.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Vietnam rank globally for informal care employment rate?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 38th and Vietnam ranks 36th of 43 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Informal care employment rate (previous ILO definition - ICLS13). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. This harmonized series for informal employment is derived using the same set of criteria across countries to improve comparability. The criteria used are based on employment status, institutional sector, destination of production, bookkeeping, registration, social security contribution, places of work and size. For more information, refer to the Worker and Sector Profiles (PROF) database description.