Guatemala vs Uganda: Informal care employment rate
Informal care employment rate over time
- Guatemala
- Uganda
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 61.12 against 60 in Uganda, a difference of 1.12.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Uganda ahead.
Guatemala ranks 8th and Uganda ranks 9th of 43 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 56.35 | 65.81 | 9.45 | Uganda |
| 2020s | 64.48 | 60 | 4.48 | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher informal care employment rate, Guatemala or Uganda?
- Guatemala, at 61.12 against 60 in Uganda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in informal care employment rate between Guatemala and Uganda?
- 1.12, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Uganda?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Guatemala and Uganda rank globally for informal care employment rate?
- Guatemala ranks 8th and Uganda ranks 9th of 43 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Informal care employment rate (previous ILO definition - ICLS13). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. This harmonized series for informal employment is derived using the same set of criteria across countries to improve comparability. The criteria used are based on employment status, institutional sector, destination of production, bookkeeping, registration, social security contribution, places of work and size. For more information, refer to the Worker and Sector Profiles (PROF) database description.