Brazil vs Guyana: Informal care employment rate
Informal care employment rate over time
- Brazil
- Guyana
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 28.66 against 23.3 in Guyana, a difference of 5.36.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.2 times Guyana's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Guyana ahead.
Brazil ranks 27th and Guyana ranks 30th of 43 countries.
Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Guyana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 29.78 | 33.52 | 3.74 | Guyana |
| 2020s | 28.19 | 30.1 | 1.91 | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher informal care employment rate, Brazil or Guyana?
- Brazil, at 28.66 against 23.3 in Guyana as of 2025.
- What is the difference in informal care employment rate between Brazil and Guyana?
- 5.36, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Guyana?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and Guyana rank globally for informal care employment rate?
- Brazil ranks 27th and Guyana ranks 30th of 43 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Informal care employment rate (previous ILO definition - ICLS13). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. This harmonized series for informal employment is derived using the same set of criteria across countries to improve comparability. The criteria used are based on employment status, institutional sector, destination of production, bookkeeping, registration, social security contribution, places of work and size. For more information, refer to the Worker and Sector Profiles (PROF) database description.