Botswana vs El Salvador: Informal care employment rate
Informal care employment rate over time
- Botswana
- El Salvador
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 57.92 against 53.41 in El Salvador, a difference of 4.51.
That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2019 it was El Salvador ahead.
Botswana ranks 10th and El Salvador ranks 13th of 43 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and El Salvador in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 52.9 | 54 | 1.1 | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 57.35 | 56.57 | 0.7876 | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher informal care employment rate, Botswana or El Salvador?
- Botswana, at 57.92 against 53.41 in El Salvador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in informal care employment rate between Botswana and El Salvador?
- 4.51, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and El Salvador?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2024.
- How do Botswana and El Salvador rank globally for informal care employment rate?
- Botswana ranks 10th and El Salvador ranks 13th of 43 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Informal care employment rate (previous ILO definition - ICLS13). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. This harmonized series for informal employment is derived using the same set of criteria across countries to improve comparability. The criteria used are based on employment status, institutional sector, destination of production, bookkeeping, registration, social security contribution, places of work and size. For more information, refer to the Worker and Sector Profiles (PROF) database description.