Mexico vs Pakistan: Informal care employment
Informal care employment over time
- Mexico
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 3,520 against 3,343 in Mexico, a difference of 177.
That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times Mexico's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Mexico ahead.
Mexico ranks 4th and Pakistan ranks 3rd of 43 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3,144 | 1,239 | 1,904 | Mexico |
| 2020s | 3,116 | 2,705 | 410.08 | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher informal care employment, Mexico or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 3,520 against 3,343 in Mexico as of 2025.
- What is the difference in informal care employment between Mexico and Pakistan?
- 177, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Pakistan?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2025.
- How do Mexico and Pakistan rank globally for informal care employment?
- Mexico ranks 4th and Pakistan ranks 3rd of 43 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Informal care employment (previous ILO definition - ICLS13). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. This harmonized series for informal employment is derived using the same set of criteria across countries to improve comparability. The criteria used are based on employment status, institutional sector, destination of production, bookkeeping, registration, social security contribution, places of work and size. For more information, refer to the Worker and Sector Profiles (PROF) database description.