Kyrgyzstan vs Uruguay: Informal care employment
Informal care employment over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 68.71 against 47.12 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 21.59.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.5 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Uruguay ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 33rd and Uruguay ranks 32nd of 43 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 48.03 | 70.54 | 22.5 | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 48.5 | 50.1 | 1.6 | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher informal care employment, Kyrgyzstan or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 68.71 against 47.12 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in informal care employment between Kyrgyzstan and Uruguay?
- 21.59, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Uruguay?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Uruguay rank globally for informal care employment?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 33rd and Uruguay ranks 32nd of 43 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Informal care employment (previous ILO definition - ICLS13). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. This harmonized series for informal employment is derived using the same set of criteria across countries to improve comparability. The criteria used are based on employment status, institutional sector, destination of production, bookkeeping, registration, social security contribution, places of work and size. For more information, refer to the Worker and Sector Profiles (PROF) database description.