Guatemala vs Zimbabwe: Informal care employment
Informal care employment over time
- Guatemala
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 502.48 against 256.21 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 246.27.
That makes Guatemala's figure about 2.0 times Zimbabwe's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Guatemala has been ahead every year.
Guatemala ranks 16th and Zimbabwe ranks 18th of 43 countries.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 419.94 | 204.85 | 215.09 | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 546.68 | 241.67 | 305.02 | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher informal care employment, Guatemala or Zimbabwe?
- Guatemala, at 502.48 against 256.21 in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in informal care employment between Guatemala and Zimbabwe?
- 246.27, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Zimbabwe?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2024.
- How do Guatemala and Zimbabwe rank globally for informal care employment?
- Guatemala ranks 16th and Zimbabwe ranks 18th of 43 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Informal care employment (previous ILO definition - ICLS13). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. This harmonized series for informal employment is derived using the same set of criteria across countries to improve comparability. The criteria used are based on employment status, institutional sector, destination of production, bookkeeping, registration, social security contribution, places of work and size. For more information, refer to the Worker and Sector Profiles (PROF) database description.