Guatemala vs Turkey: Informal care employment (previous ILO definition - ICLS13)
Informal care employment (previous ILO definition - ICLS13) over time
- Guatemala
- Turkey
How they compare
Turkey currently reports 673.86 against 502.48 in Guatemala, a difference of 171.38.
That makes Turkey's figure about 1.3 times Guatemala's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 16th and Turkey ranks 13th of 43 countries.
Turkey has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Turkey | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 397.23 | 477.79 | 80.56 | Turkey |
| 2020s | 546.68 | 686.95 | 140.27 | Turkey |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher informal care employment, Guatemala or Turkey?
- Turkey, at 673.86 against 502.48 in Guatemala as of 2025.
- What is the difference in informal care employment between Guatemala and Turkey?
- 171.38, with Turkey ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Turkey?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Guatemala and Turkey rank globally for informal care employment?
- Guatemala ranks 16th and Turkey ranks 13th of 43 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Informal care employment (previous ILO definition - ICLS13). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. This harmonized series for informal employment is derived using the same set of criteria across countries to improve comparability. The criteria used are based on employment status, institutional sector, destination of production, bookkeeping, registration, social security contribution, places of work and size. For more information, refer to the Worker and Sector Profiles (PROF) database description.