Georgia vs Uruguay: Informal care employment
Informal care employment over time
- Georgia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 129 against 68.71 in Uruguay, a difference of 60.29.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.9 times Uruguay's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Uruguay ahead.
Georgia ranks 29th and Uruguay ranks 32nd of 43 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 26.47 | 59.71 | 33.24 | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 113.65 | 55.12 | 58.52 | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher informal care employment, Georgia or Uruguay?
- Georgia, at 129 against 68.71 in Uruguay as of 2025.
- What is the difference in informal care employment between Georgia and Uruguay?
- 60.29, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Uruguay?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2025.
- How do Georgia and Uruguay rank globally for informal care employment?
- Georgia ranks 29th and Uruguay ranks 32nd of 43 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Informal care employment (previous ILO definition - ICLS13). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. This harmonized series for informal employment is derived using the same set of criteria across countries to improve comparability. The criteria used are based on employment status, institutional sector, destination of production, bookkeeping, registration, social security contribution, places of work and size. For more information, refer to the Worker and Sector Profiles (PROF) database description.