El Salvador vs Myanmar: Informal care employment
Informal care employment over time
- El Salvador
- Myanmar
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 209.74 against 173.02 in Myanmar, a difference of 36.72.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.2 times Myanmar's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Myanmar ahead.
El Salvador ranks 25th and Myanmar ranks 27th of 43 countries.
Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 167.2 | 172.85 | 5.66 | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 167.93 | 173.02 | 5.09 | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher informal care employment, El Salvador or Myanmar?
- El Salvador, at 209.74 against 173.02 in Myanmar as of 2025.
- What is the difference in informal care employment between El Salvador and Myanmar?
- 36.72, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Myanmar?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2020.
- How do El Salvador and Myanmar rank globally for informal care employment?
- El Salvador ranks 25th and Myanmar ranks 27th of 43 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Informal care employment (previous ILO definition - ICLS13). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. This harmonized series for informal employment is derived using the same set of criteria across countries to improve comparability. The criteria used are based on employment status, institutional sector, destination of production, bookkeeping, registration, social security contribution, places of work and size. For more information, refer to the Worker and Sector Profiles (PROF) database description.