Egypt vs Thailand: Informal care employment
Informal care employment over time
- Egypt
- Thailand
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 1,406 against 968.84 in Egypt, a difference of 437.16.
That makes Thailand's figure about 1.5 times Egypt's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Thailand has been ahead every year.
Egypt ranks 10th and Thailand ranks 7th of 43 countries.
Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 560.87 | 1,511 | 950.26 | Thailand |
| 2020s | 954.08 | 1,384 | 429.81 | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher informal care employment, Egypt or Thailand?
- Thailand, at 1,406 against 968.84 in Egypt as of 2024.
- What is the difference in informal care employment between Egypt and Thailand?
- 437.16, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Thailand?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Egypt and Thailand rank globally for informal care employment?
- Egypt ranks 10th and Thailand ranks 7th of 43 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Informal care employment (previous ILO definition - ICLS13). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. This harmonized series for informal employment is derived using the same set of criteria across countries to improve comparability. The criteria used are based on employment status, institutional sector, destination of production, bookkeeping, registration, social security contribution, places of work and size. For more information, refer to the Worker and Sector Profiles (PROF) database description.