Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: Informal care employment
Informal care employment over time
- Ecuador
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 256.21 against 246.07 in Ecuador, a difference of 10.14.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 20th and Zimbabwe ranks 18th of 43 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 211.14 | 204.85 | 6.29 | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 225.82 | 241.67 | 15.85 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher informal care employment, Ecuador or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 256.21 against 246.07 in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in informal care employment between Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
- 10.14, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Zimbabwe rank globally for informal care employment?
- Ecuador ranks 20th and Zimbabwe ranks 18th of 43 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Informal care employment (previous ILO definition - ICLS13). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. This harmonized series for informal employment is derived using the same set of criteria across countries to improve comparability. The criteria used are based on employment status, institutional sector, destination of production, bookkeeping, registration, social security contribution, places of work and size. For more information, refer to the Worker and Sector Profiles (PROF) database description.