Ecuador vs Honduras: Informal care employment
Informal care employment over time
- Ecuador
- Honduras
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 246.07 against 237.45 in Honduras, a difference of 8.62.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 20th and Honduras ranks 23rd of 43 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Honduras | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 318.44 | 146.6 | 171.84 | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 202.55 | 190.05 | 12.5 | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher informal care employment, Ecuador or Honduras?
- Ecuador, at 246.07 against 237.45 in Honduras as of 2025.
- What is the difference in informal care employment between Ecuador and Honduras?
- 8.62, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Honduras?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2017.
- How do Ecuador and Honduras rank globally for informal care employment?
- Ecuador ranks 20th and Honduras ranks 23rd of 43 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Informal care employment (previous ILO definition - ICLS13). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. This harmonized series for informal employment is derived using the same set of criteria across countries to improve comparability. The criteria used are based on employment status, institutional sector, destination of production, bookkeeping, registration, social security contribution, places of work and size. For more information, refer to the Worker and Sector Profiles (PROF) database description.