Colombia vs Egypt: Informal care employment
Informal care employment over time
- Colombia
- Egypt
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 968.84 against 956.43 in Colombia, a difference of 12.41.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Colombia ahead.
Colombia ranks 11th and Egypt ranks 10th of 43 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 2 and Egypt in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Egypt | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,281 | 258.72 | 1,022 | Colombia |
| 2010s | 1,197 | 456.08 | 740.52 | Colombia |
| 2020s | 929.07 | 954.08 | 25 | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher informal care employment, Colombia or Egypt?
- Egypt, at 968.84 against 956.43 in Colombia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in informal care employment between Colombia and Egypt?
- 12.41, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Egypt?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2024.
- How do Colombia and Egypt rank globally for informal care employment?
- Colombia ranks 11th and Egypt ranks 10th of 43 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Informal care employment (previous ILO definition - ICLS13). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. This harmonized series for informal employment is derived using the same set of criteria across countries to improve comparability. The criteria used are based on employment status, institutional sector, destination of production, bookkeeping, registration, social security contribution, places of work and size. For more information, refer to the Worker and Sector Profiles (PROF) database description.