Botswana vs Georgia: Informal care employment
Informal care employment over time
- Botswana
- Georgia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 129 against 83.46 in Botswana, a difference of 45.54.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.5 times Botswana's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 31st and Georgia ranks 29th of 43 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Georgia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 68.16 | 26.47 | 41.69 | Botswana |
| 2020s | 78 | 110.58 | 32.58 | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher informal care employment, Botswana or Georgia?
- Georgia, at 129 against 83.46 in Botswana as of 2025.
- What is the difference in informal care employment between Botswana and Georgia?
- 45.54, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Georgia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2024.
- How do Botswana and Georgia rank globally for informal care employment?
- Botswana ranks 31st and Georgia ranks 29th of 43 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Informal care employment (previous ILO definition - ICLS13). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. This harmonized series for informal employment is derived using the same set of criteria across countries to improve comparability. The criteria used are based on employment status, institutional sector, destination of production, bookkeeping, registration, social security contribution, places of work and size. For more information, refer to the Worker and Sector Profiles (PROF) database description.