Lithuania vs Romania: Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national

Lithuania
93.39 Percentage of population in the same subgroup
in 2025
Romania
97.54 Percentage of population in the same subgroup
in 2025
Lithuania rank
2nd
Romania rank
2nd

Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national over time

  • Lithuania
  • Romania
020406080100199820112025

How they compare

Romania currently reports 97.54 Percentage of population in the same subgroup against 93.39 Percentage of population in the same subgroup in Lithuania, a difference of 4.15 Percentage of population in the same subgroup.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Lithuania ahead.

Lithuania ranks 2nd and Romania ranks 2nd of 11 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 2 and Romania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Romania Difference Ahead
2000s 90.92 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 88.37 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 2.55 Percentage of population in the same subgroup Lithuania
2010s 91.48 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 90.63 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 0.8475 Percentage of population in the same subgroup Lithuania
2020s 92.99 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 96.05 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 3.07 Percentage of population in the same subgroup Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national, Lithuania or Romania?
Romania, at 97.54 Percentage of population in the same subgroup against 93.39 Percentage of population in the same subgroup in Lithuania as of 2025.
What is the difference in incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national between Lithuania and Romania?
4.15 Percentage of population in the same subgroup, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Romania?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Lithuania and Romania rank globally for incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national?
Lithuania ranks 2nd and Romania ranks 2nd of 11 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national definitions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Romania: Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/incidence-of-full-time-and-part-time-employment-based-on-national-definitions/lithuania-2/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/incidence-of-full-time-and-part-time-employment-based-on-national-definitions/lithuania-2/romania/">Lithuania vs Romania: Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national definitions
Unit
Percentage of population in the same subgroup
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
53 places, 1,842 data points, 1966–2025
Last refreshed

This dataset contains incidences and gender composition of part-time employment with standardised (15-24, 25-54, 55-64, 65+, total) and detailed age groups. Data are further broken down by professional status - employees, total employment. Part-time employment is based on national definitions. The definition of part-time work varies considerably across OECD countries Essentially three main approaches can be distinguished: i) a classification based on the worker's perception of his/her employment situation; ii) a cut-off (generally 30 or 35 hours per week) based on usual working hours, with persons usually working fewer hours being considered part-timers; iii) a comparable cut-off based on actual hours worked during the reference week. A criterion based on actual hours will generally yield a part-time rate higher than one based on usual hours, particularly if there are temporary reductions in working time as a result of holidays, illness, short-timing, etc. On the other hand, it is not entirely clear whether a classification based on the worker's perception will necessarily yield estimates of part-time work that are higher or lower than one based on a fixed cut-off. In one country (France) which changed from 1981 to 1982 from a definition based on an actual hours cut-off (30 hours) to one based on the respondent's perception, the latter criterion appeared to produce slightly higher estimates. In order to facilitate analysis and comparisons over time, historical data for OECD members have been provided over as long a period as possible, often even before a country became a member of the Organisation. Information on the membership dates of all OECD countries can be found at OECD Ratification Dates. For detailed information on labour force surveys for all countries please see LFS_NOTES_SOURCES.