Chile vs OECD: Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national

Chile
80.03 Percentage of population in the same subgroup
in 2025
OECD
79.66 Percentage of population in the same subgroup
in 2025
Chile rank
22nd
OECD rank
24th

Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national over time

  • Chile
  • OECD
020406080100196619952025

How they compare

Chile currently reports 80.03 Percentage of population in the same subgroup against 79.66 Percentage of population in the same subgroup in OECD, a difference of 0.37 Percentage of population in the same subgroup.

Across all 30 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 22nd and OECD ranks 24th of 40 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile OECD Difference Ahead
1990s 92.69 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 83.07 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 9.63 Percentage of population in the same subgroup Chile
2000s 91.85 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 82.02 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 9.83 Percentage of population in the same subgroup Chile
2010s 80.64 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 79.8 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 0.8388 Percentage of population in the same subgroup Chile
2020s 80.66 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 80.07 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 0.587 Percentage of population in the same subgroup Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national, Chile or OECD?
Chile, at 80.03 Percentage of population in the same subgroup against 79.66 Percentage of population in the same subgroup in OECD as of 2025.
What is the difference in incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national between Chile and OECD?
0.37 Percentage of population in the same subgroup, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and OECD?
30 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Chile and OECD rank globally for incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national?
Chile ranks 22nd and OECD ranks 24th of 40 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national definitions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs OECD: Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/incidence-of-full-time-and-part-time-employment-based-on-national-definitions/chile/oecd/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/incidence-of-full-time-and-part-time-employment-based-on-national-definitions/chile/oecd/">Chile vs OECD: Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national definitions
Unit
Percentage of population in the same subgroup
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
53 places, 1,842 data points, 1966–2025
Last refreshed

This dataset contains incidences and gender composition of part-time employment with standardised (15-24, 25-54, 55-64, 65+, total) and detailed age groups. Data are further broken down by professional status - employees, total employment. Part-time employment is based on national definitions. The definition of part-time work varies considerably across OECD countries Essentially three main approaches can be distinguished: i) a classification based on the worker's perception of his/her employment situation; ii) a cut-off (generally 30 or 35 hours per week) based on usual working hours, with persons usually working fewer hours being considered part-timers; iii) a comparable cut-off based on actual hours worked during the reference week. A criterion based on actual hours will generally yield a part-time rate higher than one based on usual hours, particularly if there are temporary reductions in working time as a result of holidays, illness, short-timing, etc. On the other hand, it is not entirely clear whether a classification based on the worker's perception will necessarily yield estimates of part-time work that are higher or lower than one based on a fixed cut-off. In one country (France) which changed from 1981 to 1982 from a definition based on an actual hours cut-off (30 hours) to one based on the respondent's perception, the latter criterion appeared to produce slightly higher estimates. In order to facilitate analysis and comparisons over time, historical data for OECD members have been provided over as long a period as possible, often even before a country became a member of the Organisation. Information on the membership dates of all OECD countries can be found at OECD Ratification Dates. For detailed information on labour force surveys for all countries please see LFS_NOTES_SOURCES.