Chile vs Finland: Gender wage gap
Gender wage gap over time
- Chile
- Finland
How they compare
Finland currently reports 16.81 against 16.26 in Chile, a difference of 0.55.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 14th and Finland ranks 13th of 67 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.27 | 21.25 | 10.98 | Finland |
| 2010s | 14.58 | 17.56 | 2.98 | Finland |
| 2020s | 12.14 | 16.34 | 4.2 | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gender wage gap, Chile or Finland?
- Finland, at 16.81 against 16.26 in Chile as of 2022.
- What is the difference in gender wage gap between Chile and Finland?
- 0.55, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Finland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2022.
- How do Chile and Finland rank globally for gender wage gap?
- Chile ranks 14th and Finland ranks 13th of 67 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Gender wage gap. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. The gender wage gap is unadjusted and is calculated as the difference between average earnings of men and average earnings of women expressed as a percentage of average earnings of men. This indicator provides a measure of the relative difference between the earnings of men and those of women. Data disaggregated by occupation are provided according to the latest version of the International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO). Data may have been regrouped from the national classifications, which may not be strictly compatible with ISCO. For more information, refer to the Wages and Working Time Statistics (COND) database description.