Sub-Saharan Africa vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Full-time equivalent employment (ILO modelled estimates)

Sub-Saharan Africa
510,556
in 2027
Tanzania, United Republic of
35,709
in 2027
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
20th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
19th

Full-time equivalent employment (ILO modelled estimates) over time

  • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k200520162027

How they compare

Sub-Saharan Africa currently reports 510,556 against 35,709 in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 474,847.

That makes Sub-Saharan Africa's figure about 14.3 times Tanzania, United Republic of's.

Across all 23 years both countries report, Sub-Saharan Africa has been ahead every year.

Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 20th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 19th of 87 groups.

Sub-Saharan Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sub-Saharan Africa Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
2000s 281,033 16,288 264,745 Sub-Saharan Africa
2010s 347,918 21,454 326,464 Sub-Saharan Africa
2020s 453,696 31,614 422,082 Sub-Saharan Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher full-time equivalent employment (ilo modelled estimates), Sub-Saharan Africa or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Sub-Saharan Africa, at 510,556 against 35,709 in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2027.
What is the difference in full-time equivalent employment (ilo modelled estimates) between Sub-Saharan Africa and Tanzania, United Republic of?
474,847, with Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa and Tanzania, United Republic of?
23 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2027.
How do Sub-Saharan Africa and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for full-time equivalent employment (ilo modelled estimates)?
Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 20th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 19th of 87 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as Full-time equivalent employment (ILO modelled estimates) (Based on 40 hours per week). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sub-Saharan Africa vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Full-time equivalent employment (ILO modelled estimates). Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/full-time-equivalent-employment-ilo-modelled-estimates-based-on-40-hours-per-week/sub-saharan-africa/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/full-time-equivalent-employment-ilo-modelled-estimates-based-on-40-hours-per-week/sub-saharan-africa/tanzania/">Sub-Saharan Africa vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Full-time equivalent employment (ILO modelled estimates)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Full-time equivalent employment (ILO modelled estimates) (Based on 40 hours per week)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
276 places, 6,324 data points, 2005–2027
Last refreshed

Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. This indicator refers to total weekly hours actually worked for employed persons in their main job divided by 40 or 48. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.