Southern Asia: Upper-middle income vs Zimbabwe: Full-time equivalent employment (ILO modelled estimates)

Southern Asia: Upper-middle income
31,722
in 2027
Zimbabwe
7,335
in 2027
Southern Asia: Upper-middle income rank
68th
Zimbabwe rank
67th

Full-time equivalent employment (ILO modelled estimates) over time

  • Southern Asia: Upper-middle income
  • Zimbabwe
010.0k20.0k30.0k200520162027

How they compare

Southern Asia: Upper-middle income currently reports 31,722 against 7,335 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 24,387.

That makes Southern Asia: Upper-middle income's figure about 4.3 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 23 years both countries report, Southern Asia: Upper-middle income has been ahead every year.

Southern Asia: Upper-middle income ranks 68th and Zimbabwe ranks 67th of 87 groups.

Southern Asia: Upper-middle income has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Southern Asia: Upper-middle income Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 25,918 4,276 21,643 Southern Asia: Upper-middle income
2010s 26,469 4,623 21,846 Southern Asia: Upper-middle income
2020s 29,912 6,343 23,569 Southern Asia: Upper-middle income

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher full-time equivalent employment (ilo modelled estimates), Southern Asia: Upper-middle income or Zimbabwe?
Southern Asia: Upper-middle income, at 31,722 against 7,335 in Zimbabwe as of 2027.
What is the difference in full-time equivalent employment (ilo modelled estimates) between Southern Asia: Upper-middle income and Zimbabwe?
24,387, with Southern Asia: Upper-middle income ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Southern Asia: Upper-middle income and Zimbabwe?
23 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2027.
How do Southern Asia: Upper-middle income and Zimbabwe rank globally for full-time equivalent employment (ilo modelled estimates)?
Southern Asia: Upper-middle income ranks 68th and Zimbabwe ranks 67th of 87 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as Full-time equivalent employment (ILO modelled estimates) (Based on 40 hours per week). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Southern Asia: Upper-middle income vs Zimbabwe: Full-time equivalent employment (ILO modelled estimates). Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/full-time-equivalent-employment-ilo-modelled-estimates-based-on-40-hours-per-week/southern-asia-upper-middle-income/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/full-time-equivalent-employment-ilo-modelled-estimates-based-on-40-hours-per-week/southern-asia-upper-middle-income/zimbabwe/">Southern Asia: Upper-middle income vs Zimbabwe: Full-time equivalent employment (ILO modelled estimates)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Full-time equivalent employment (ILO modelled estimates) (Based on 40 hours per week)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
276 places, 6,324 data points, 2005–2027
Last refreshed

Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. This indicator refers to total weekly hours actually worked for employed persons in their main job divided by 40 or 48. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.