South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Full-time equivalent employment (ILO modelled estimates)

South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific
376,947
in 2027
Tanzania, United Republic of
35,709
in 2027
South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific rank
22nd
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
19th

Full-time equivalent employment (ILO modelled estimates) over time

  • South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k200520162027

How they compare

South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific currently reports 376,947 against 35,709 in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 341,238.

That makes South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific's figure about 10.6 times Tanzania, United Republic of's.

Across all 23 years both countries report, South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific has been ahead every year.

South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific ranks 22nd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 19th of 87 groups.

South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
2000s 296,835 16,288 280,547 South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific
2010s 334,185 21,454 312,731 South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific
2020s 357,136 31,614 325,522 South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher full-time equivalent employment (ilo modelled estimates), South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific or Tanzania, United Republic of?
South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific, at 376,947 against 35,709 in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2027.
What is the difference in full-time equivalent employment (ilo modelled estimates) between South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific and Tanzania, United Republic of?
341,238, with South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific and Tanzania, United Republic of?
23 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2027.
How do South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for full-time equivalent employment (ilo modelled estimates)?
South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific ranks 22nd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 19th of 87 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as Full-time equivalent employment (ILO modelled estimates) (Based on 40 hours per week). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Full-time equivalent employment (ILO modelled estimates). Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/full-time-equivalent-employment-ilo-modelled-estimates-based-on-40-hours-per-week/south-eastern-asia-and-the-pacific/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/full-time-equivalent-employment-ilo-modelled-estimates-based-on-40-hours-per-week/south-eastern-asia-and-the-pacific/tanzania/">South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Full-time equivalent employment (ILO modelled estimates)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Full-time equivalent employment (ILO modelled estimates) (Based on 40 hours per week)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
276 places, 6,324 data points, 2005–2027
Last refreshed

Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. This indicator refers to total weekly hours actually worked for employed persons in their main job divided by 40 or 48. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.