Japan vs Southern Asia: Lower-middle income: Full-time equivalent employment (ILO modelled estimates)

Japan
52,435
in 2027
Southern Asia: Lower-middle income
898,745
in 2027
Japan rank
13th
Southern Asia: Lower-middle income rank
14th

Full-time equivalent employment (ILO modelled estimates) over time

  • Japan
  • Southern Asia: Lower-middle income
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k200520162027

How they compare

Southern Asia: Lower-middle income currently reports 898,745 against 52,435 in Japan, a difference of 846,310.

That makes Southern Asia: Lower-middle income's figure about 17.1 times Japan's.

Across all 23 years both countries report, Southern Asia: Lower-middle income has been ahead every year.

Japan ranks 13th and Southern Asia: Lower-middle income ranks 14th of 188 countries.

Southern Asia: Lower-middle income has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan Southern Asia: Lower-middle income Difference Ahead
2000s 54,182 639,241 585,058 Southern Asia: Lower-middle income
2010s 52,887 723,551 670,664 Southern Asia: Lower-middle income
2020s 52,110 841,636 789,527 Southern Asia: Lower-middle income

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher full-time equivalent employment (ilo modelled estimates), Japan or Southern Asia: Lower-middle income?
Southern Asia: Lower-middle income, at 898,745 against 52,435 in Japan as of 2027.
What is the difference in full-time equivalent employment (ilo modelled estimates) between Japan and Southern Asia: Lower-middle income?
846,310, with Southern Asia: Lower-middle income ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Southern Asia: Lower-middle income?
23 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2027.
How do Japan and Southern Asia: Lower-middle income rank globally for full-time equivalent employment (ilo modelled estimates)?
Japan ranks 13th and Southern Asia: Lower-middle income ranks 14th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as Full-time equivalent employment (ILO modelled estimates) (Based on 40 hours per week). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Japan vs Southern Asia: Lower-middle income: Full-time equivalent employment (ILO modelled estimates). Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/full-time-equivalent-employment-ilo-modelled-estimates-based-on-40-hours-per-week/japan/southern-asia-lower-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/full-time-equivalent-employment-ilo-modelled-estimates-based-on-40-hours-per-week/japan/southern-asia-lower-middle-income/">Japan vs Southern Asia: Lower-middle income: Full-time equivalent employment (ILO modelled estimates)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Full-time equivalent employment (ILO modelled estimates) (Based on 40 hours per week)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
276 places, 6,324 data points, 2005–2027
Last refreshed

Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. This indicator refers to total weekly hours actually worked for employed persons in their main job divided by 40 or 48. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.