Equatorial Guinea vs Latvia: Full-time equivalent employment (ILO modelled estimates)
Full-time equivalent employment (ILO modelled estimates) over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Latvia
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 789.54 against 764.06 in Latvia, a difference of 25.48.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Latvia ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 149th and Latvia ranks 150th of 188 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 393.39 | 978.12 | 584.73 | Latvia |
| 2010s | 564.09 | 807.23 | 243.14 | Latvia |
| 2020s | 720.07 | 775.77 | 55.7 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher full-time equivalent employment (ilo modelled estimates), Equatorial Guinea or Latvia?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 789.54 against 764.06 in Latvia as of 2027.
- What is the difference in full-time equivalent employment (ilo modelled estimates) between Equatorial Guinea and Latvia?
- 25.48, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Latvia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2027.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Latvia rank globally for full-time equivalent employment (ilo modelled estimates)?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 149th and Latvia ranks 150th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Full-time equivalent employment (ILO modelled estimates) (Based on 40 hours per week). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. This indicator refers to total weekly hours actually worked for employed persons in their main job divided by 40 or 48. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.