How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Taiwan?

23 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2027.

Where does this data come from?

International Labour Organization, published as Full-time equivalent employment (ILO modelled estimates) (Based on 40 hours per week). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Australia vs Taiwan: Full-time equivalent employment (ILO modelled estimates) (Based on 40)

Australia

11,253

in 2027

Taiwan

11,360

in 2027

Australia rank

53rd

Taiwan rank

52nd

Full-time equivalent employment (ILO modelled estimates) (Based on 40) over time

Australia
Taiwan

How they compare

Taiwan currently reports 11,360 against 11,253 in Australia, a difference of 107.

Across all 23 years both countries report, Taiwan has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 53rd and Taiwan ranks 52nd of 188 countries.

Taiwan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Australia	Taiwan	Difference	Ahead
2000s	8,599	10,449	1,850	Taiwan
2010s	9,568	11,207	1,639	Taiwan
2020s	10,827	11,369	542.82	Taiwan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher full-time equivalent employment (ilo modelled estimates), Australia or Taiwan?: Taiwan, at 11,360 against 11,253 in Australia as of 2027.
What is the difference in full-time equivalent employment (ilo modelled estimates) between Australia and Taiwan?: 107, with Taiwan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Taiwan?: 23 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2027.
How do Australia and Taiwan rank globally for full-time equivalent employment (ilo modelled estimates)?: Australia ranks 53rd and Taiwan ranks 52nd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?: International Labour Organization, published as Full-time equivalent employment (ILO modelled estimates) (Based on 40 hours per week). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Taiwan: Full-time equivalent employment (ILO modelled estimates). Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/full-time-equivalent-employment-ilo-modelled-estimates-based-on-40-hours-per-week/australia/taiwan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/full-time-equivalent-employment-ilo-modelled-estimates-based-on-40-hours-per-week/australia/taiwan/">Australia vs Taiwan: Full-time equivalent employment (ILO modelled estimates)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Full-time equivalent employment (ILO modelled estimates) (Based on 40 hours per week)
Source: International Labour Organization
Licence: ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage: 276 places, 6,324 data points, 2005–2027
Last refreshed: 25 August 2026

Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. This indicator refers to total weekly hours actually worked for employed persons in their main job divided by 40 or 48. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.