Australia vs Eastern Asia: High income: Full-time equivalent employment (ILO modelled estimates)

Australia
11,253
in 2027
Eastern Asia: High income
95,070
in 2027
Australia rank
53rd
Eastern Asia: High income rank
53rd

Full-time equivalent employment (ILO modelled estimates) over time

  • Australia
  • Eastern Asia: High income
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k200520162027

How they compare

Eastern Asia: High income currently reports 95,070 against 11,253 in Australia, a difference of 83,817.

That makes Eastern Asia: High income's figure about 8.4 times Australia's.

Across all 23 years both countries report, Eastern Asia: High income has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 53rd and Eastern Asia: High income ranks 53rd of 188 countries.

Eastern Asia: High income has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Eastern Asia: High income Difference Ahead
2000s 8,599 96,083 87,484 Eastern Asia: High income
2010s 9,568 96,443 86,875 Eastern Asia: High income
2020s 10,827 94,816 83,990 Eastern Asia: High income

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher full-time equivalent employment (ilo modelled estimates), Australia or Eastern Asia: High income?
Eastern Asia: High income, at 95,070 against 11,253 in Australia as of 2027.
What is the difference in full-time equivalent employment (ilo modelled estimates) between Australia and Eastern Asia: High income?
83,817, with Eastern Asia: High income ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Eastern Asia: High income?
23 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2027.
How do Australia and Eastern Asia: High income rank globally for full-time equivalent employment (ilo modelled estimates)?
Australia ranks 53rd and Eastern Asia: High income ranks 53rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as Full-time equivalent employment (ILO modelled estimates) (Based on 40 hours per week). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Eastern Asia: High income: Full-time equivalent employment (ILO modelled estimates). Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/full-time-equivalent-employment-ilo-modelled-estimates-based-on-40-hours-per-week/australia/eastern-asia-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/full-time-equivalent-employment-ilo-modelled-estimates-based-on-40-hours-per-week/australia/eastern-asia-high-income/">Australia vs Eastern Asia: High income: Full-time equivalent employment (ILO modelled estimates)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Full-time equivalent employment (ILO modelled estimates) (Based on 40 hours per week)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
276 places, 6,324 data points, 2005–2027
Last refreshed

Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. This indicator refers to total weekly hours actually worked for employed persons in their main job divided by 40 or 48. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.