Asia and the Pacific: Low income vs Zimbabwe: Full-time equivalent employment (ILO modelled estimates) (Based on 40)

Asia and the Pacific: Low income
25,698
in 2027
Zimbabwe
7,335
in 2027
Asia and the Pacific: Low income rank
70th
Zimbabwe rank
67th

Full-time equivalent employment (ILO modelled estimates) (Based on 40) over time

  • Asia and the Pacific: Low income
  • Zimbabwe
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k200520162027

How they compare

Asia and the Pacific: Low income currently reports 25,698 against 7,335 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 18,363.

That makes Asia and the Pacific: Low income's figure about 3.5 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 23 years both countries report, Asia and the Pacific: Low income has been ahead every year.

Asia and the Pacific: Low income ranks 70th and Zimbabwe ranks 67th of 87 groups.

Asia and the Pacific: Low income has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Asia and the Pacific: Low income Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 20,846 4,276 16,571 Asia and the Pacific: Low income
2010s 23,768 4,623 19,145 Asia and the Pacific: Low income
2020s 24,812 6,343 18,468 Asia and the Pacific: Low income

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher full-time equivalent employment (ilo modelled estimates), Asia and the Pacific: Low income or Zimbabwe?
Asia and the Pacific: Low income, at 25,698 against 7,335 in Zimbabwe as of 2027.
What is the difference in full-time equivalent employment (ilo modelled estimates) between Asia and the Pacific: Low income and Zimbabwe?
18,363, with Asia and the Pacific: Low income ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Asia and the Pacific: Low income and Zimbabwe?
23 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2027.
How do Asia and the Pacific: Low income and Zimbabwe rank globally for full-time equivalent employment (ilo modelled estimates)?
Asia and the Pacific: Low income ranks 70th and Zimbabwe ranks 67th of 87 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as Full-time equivalent employment (ILO modelled estimates) (Based on 40 hours per week). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Asia and the Pacific: Low income vs Zimbabwe: Full-time equivalent employment (ILO modelled estimates). Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/full-time-equivalent-employment-ilo-modelled-estimates-based-on-40-hours-per-week/asia-and-the-pacific-low-income/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/full-time-equivalent-employment-ilo-modelled-estimates-based-on-40-hours-per-week/asia-and-the-pacific-low-income/zimbabwe/">Asia and the Pacific: Low income vs Zimbabwe: Full-time equivalent employment (ILO modelled estimates)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Full-time equivalent employment (ILO modelled estimates) (Based on 40 hours per week)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
276 places, 6,324 data points, 2005–2027
Last refreshed

Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. This indicator refers to total weekly hours actually worked for employed persons in their main job divided by 40 or 48. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.