Japan vs Lithuania: Full-time and part-time employment based on OECD-harmonized definition

Japan
48,640 Persons
in 2025
Lithuania
1,395 Persons
in 2025
Japan rank
7th
Lithuania rank
6th

Full-time and part-time employment based on OECD-harmonized definition over time

  • Japan
  • Lithuania
020.0k40.0k60.0k198020022025

How they compare

Japan currently reports 48,640 Persons against 1,395 Persons in Lithuania, a difference of 47,245 Persons.

That makes Japan's figure about 34.9 times Lithuania's.

Across all 28 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.

Japan ranks 7th and Lithuania ranks 6th of 40 countries.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan Lithuania Difference Ahead
1990s 52,902 Persons 1,298 Persons 51,604 Persons Japan
2000s 50,873 Persons 1,291 Persons 49,581 Persons Japan
2010s 48,156 Persons 1,228 Persons 46,928 Persons Japan
2020s 48,283 Persons 1,351 Persons 46,932 Persons Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher full-time and part-time employment based on oecd-harmonized definition, Japan or Lithuania?
Japan, at 48,640 Persons against 1,395 Persons in Lithuania as of 2025.
What is the difference in full-time and part-time employment based on oecd-harmonized definition between Japan and Lithuania?
47,245 Persons, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Lithuania?
28 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2025.
How do Japan and Lithuania rank globally for full-time and part-time employment based on oecd-harmonized definition?
Japan ranks 7th and Lithuania ranks 6th of 40 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Full-time and part-time employment based on OECD-harmonized definition. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Japan vs Lithuania: Full-time and part-time employment based on OECD-harmonized definition. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/full-time-and-part-time-employment-based-on-oecd-harmonized-definition/japan/lithuania-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/full-time-and-part-time-employment-based-on-oecd-harmonized-definition/japan/lithuania-2/">Japan vs Lithuania: Full-time and part-time employment based on OECD-harmonized definition</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Full-time and part-time employment based on OECD-harmonized definition
Unit
Persons
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
54 places, 1,807 data points, 1976–2025
Last refreshed

This dataset based on so-called OECD harmonized definition contains data on full-time and part-time employment according to a common definition of 30-usual weekly hours of work in the main job. Data are broken down by professional status - employees, total employment - sex and standardised age groups (15-24, 25-54, 55+, total) In order to facilitate analysis and comparisons over time, historical data for OECD members have been provided over as long a period as possible, often even before a country became a member of the Organisation. Information on the membership dates of all OECD countries can be found at OECD Ratification Dates. For detailed information on labour force surveys for all countries please see LFS_NOTES_SOURCES.