Croatia vs Korea: Full-time and part-time employment based on OECD-harmonized definition

Croatia
1,645 Persons
in 2025
Korea
23,454 Persons
in 2025
Croatia rank
3rd
Korea rank
1st

Full-time and part-time employment based on OECD-harmonized definition over time

  • Croatia
  • Korea
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k198920072025

How they compare

Korea currently reports 23,454 Persons against 1,645 Persons in Croatia, a difference of 21,809 Persons.

That makes Korea's figure about 14.3 times Croatia's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Korea has been ahead every year.

Croatia ranks 3rd and Korea ranks 1st of 3 countries.

Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Korea Difference Ahead
2000s 1,530 Persons 20,735 Persons 19,205 Persons Korea
2010s 1,487 Persons 22,481 Persons 20,994 Persons Korea
2020s 1,556 Persons 22,964 Persons 21,407 Persons Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher full-time and part-time employment based on oecd-harmonized definition, Croatia or Korea?
Korea, at 23,454 Persons against 1,645 Persons in Croatia as of 2025.
What is the difference in full-time and part-time employment based on oecd-harmonized definition between Croatia and Korea?
21,809 Persons, with Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Korea?
24 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2025.
How do Croatia and Korea rank globally for full-time and part-time employment based on oecd-harmonized definition?
Croatia ranks 3rd and Korea ranks 1st of 3 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Full-time and part-time employment based on OECD-harmonized definition. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs Korea: Full-time and part-time employment based on OECD-harmonized definition. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/full-time-and-part-time-employment-based-on-oecd-harmonized-definition/croatia-2/korea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/full-time-and-part-time-employment-based-on-oecd-harmonized-definition/croatia-2/korea/">Croatia vs Korea: Full-time and part-time employment based on OECD-harmonized definition</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Full-time and part-time employment based on OECD-harmonized definition
Unit
Persons
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
54 places, 1,807 data points, 1976–2025
Last refreshed

This dataset based on so-called OECD harmonized definition contains data on full-time and part-time employment according to a common definition of 30-usual weekly hours of work in the main job. Data are broken down by professional status - employees, total employment - sex and standardised age groups (15-24, 25-54, 55+, total) In order to facilitate analysis and comparisons over time, historical data for OECD members have been provided over as long a period as possible, often even before a country became a member of the Organisation. Information on the membership dates of all OECD countries can be found at OECD Ratification Dates. For detailed information on labour force surveys for all countries please see LFS_NOTES_SOURCES.