Brazil vs Korea: Full-time and part-time employment based on OECD-harmonized definition

Brazil
89,044 Persons
in 2024
Korea
23,454 Persons
in 2025
Brazil rank
3rd
Korea rank
1st

Full-time and part-time employment based on OECD-harmonized definition over time

  • Brazil
  • Korea
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k198920072025

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 89,044 Persons against 23,454 Persons in Korea, a difference of 65,590 Persons.

That makes Brazil's figure about 3.8 times Korea's.

Across all 23 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.

Brazil ranks 3rd and Korea ranks 1st of 40 countries.

Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Korea Difference Ahead
2000s 69,363 Persons 20,633 Persons 48,730 Persons Brazil
2010s 77,528 Persons 22,629 Persons 54,899 Persons Brazil
2020s 81,997 Persons 22,866 Persons 59,131 Persons Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher full-time and part-time employment based on oecd-harmonized definition, Brazil or Korea?
Brazil, at 89,044 Persons against 23,454 Persons in Korea as of 2024.
What is the difference in full-time and part-time employment based on oecd-harmonized definition between Brazil and Korea?
65,590 Persons, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Korea?
23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Brazil and Korea rank globally for full-time and part-time employment based on oecd-harmonized definition?
Brazil ranks 3rd and Korea ranks 1st of 40 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Full-time and part-time employment based on OECD-harmonized definition. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Korea: Full-time and part-time employment based on OECD-harmonized definition. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/full-time-and-part-time-employment-based-on-oecd-harmonized-definition/brazil/korea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/full-time-and-part-time-employment-based-on-oecd-harmonized-definition/brazil/korea/">Brazil vs Korea: Full-time and part-time employment based on OECD-harmonized definition</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Full-time and part-time employment based on OECD-harmonized definition
Unit
Persons
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
54 places, 1,807 data points, 1976–2025
Last refreshed

This dataset based on so-called OECD harmonized definition contains data on full-time and part-time employment according to a common definition of 30-usual weekly hours of work in the main job. Data are broken down by professional status - employees, total employment - sex and standardised age groups (15-24, 25-54, 55+, total) In order to facilitate analysis and comparisons over time, historical data for OECD members have been provided over as long a period as possible, often even before a country became a member of the Organisation. Information on the membership dates of all OECD countries can be found at OECD Ratification Dates. For detailed information on labour force surveys for all countries please see LFS_NOTES_SOURCES.