Australia vs Chile: Full-time and part-time employment based on OECD-harmonized definition

Australia
11,048 Persons
in 2025
Chile
7,761 Persons
in 2025
Australia rank
16th
Chile rank
18th

Full-time and part-time employment based on OECD-harmonized definition over time

  • Australia
  • Chile
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k199620102025

How they compare

Australia currently reports 11,048 Persons against 7,761 Persons in Chile, a difference of 3,287 Persons.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.4 times Chile's.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 16th and Chile ranks 18th of 40 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Chile Difference Ahead
2000s 7,507 Persons 5,266 Persons 2,241 Persons Australia
2010s 8,795 Persons 6,847 Persons 1,948 Persons Australia
2020s 10,340 Persons 7,331 Persons 3,009 Persons Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher full-time and part-time employment based on oecd-harmonized definition, Australia or Chile?
Australia, at 11,048 Persons against 7,761 Persons in Chile as of 2025.
What is the difference in full-time and part-time employment based on oecd-harmonized definition between Australia and Chile?
3,287 Persons, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Chile?
25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
How do Australia and Chile rank globally for full-time and part-time employment based on oecd-harmonized definition?
Australia ranks 16th and Chile ranks 18th of 40 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Full-time and part-time employment based on OECD-harmonized definition. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Chile: Full-time and part-time employment based on OECD-harmonized definition. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/full-time-and-part-time-employment-based-on-oecd-harmonized-definition/australia/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/full-time-and-part-time-employment-based-on-oecd-harmonized-definition/australia/chile/">Australia vs Chile: Full-time and part-time employment based on OECD-harmonized definition</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Full-time and part-time employment based on OECD-harmonized definition
Unit
Persons
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
54 places, 1,807 data points, 1976–2025
Last refreshed

This dataset based on so-called OECD harmonized definition contains data on full-time and part-time employment according to a common definition of 30-usual weekly hours of work in the main job. Data are broken down by professional status - employees, total employment - sex and standardised age groups (15-24, 25-54, 55+, total) In order to facilitate analysis and comparisons over time, historical data for OECD members have been provided over as long a period as possible, often even before a country became a member of the Organisation. Information on the membership dates of all OECD countries can be found at OECD Ratification Dates. For detailed information on labour force surveys for all countries please see LFS_NOTES_SOURCES.