Australia vs Canada: Full-time and part-time employment based on OECD-harmonized definition

Australia
11,048 Persons
in 2025
Canada
17,185 Persons
in 2025
Australia rank
16th
Canada rank
14th

Full-time and part-time employment based on OECD-harmonized definition over time

  • Australia
  • Canada
05.0k10.0k15.0k197620002025

How they compare

Canada currently reports 17,185 Persons against 11,048 Persons in Australia, a difference of 6,137 Persons.

That makes Canada's figure about 1.6 times Australia's.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 16th and Canada ranks 14th of 40 countries.

Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Canada Difference Ahead
2000s 7,507 Persons 13,090 Persons 5,583 Persons Canada
2010s 8,795 Persons 14,449 Persons 5,654 Persons Canada
2020s 10,340 Persons 16,219 Persons 5,879 Persons Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher full-time and part-time employment based on oecd-harmonized definition, Australia or Canada?
Canada, at 17,185 Persons against 11,048 Persons in Australia as of 2025.
What is the difference in full-time and part-time employment based on oecd-harmonized definition between Australia and Canada?
6,137 Persons, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Canada?
25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
How do Australia and Canada rank globally for full-time and part-time employment based on oecd-harmonized definition?
Australia ranks 16th and Canada ranks 14th of 40 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Full-time and part-time employment based on OECD-harmonized definition. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Canada: Full-time and part-time employment based on OECD-harmonized definition. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/full-time-and-part-time-employment-based-on-oecd-harmonized-definition/australia/canada/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/full-time-and-part-time-employment-based-on-oecd-harmonized-definition/australia/canada/">Australia vs Canada: Full-time and part-time employment based on OECD-harmonized definition</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Full-time and part-time employment based on OECD-harmonized definition
Unit
Persons
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
54 places, 1,807 data points, 1976–2025
Last refreshed

This dataset based on so-called OECD harmonized definition contains data on full-time and part-time employment according to a common definition of 30-usual weekly hours of work in the main job. Data are broken down by professional status - employees, total employment - sex and standardised age groups (15-24, 25-54, 55+, total) In order to facilitate analysis and comparisons over time, historical data for OECD members have been provided over as long a period as possible, often even before a country became a member of the Organisation. Information on the membership dates of all OECD countries can be found at OECD Ratification Dates. For detailed information on labour force surveys for all countries please see LFS_NOTES_SOURCES.