Slovak Republic vs United States of America: Full-time and part-time employment based on national definition

Slovak Republic
2,476 Persons
in 2025
United States of America
134,927 Persons
in 2025
Slovak Republic rank
1st
United States of America rank
2nd

Full-time and part-time employment based on national definition over time

  • Slovak Republic
  • United States of America
050.0k100.0k150.0k197620002025

How they compare

United States of America currently reports 134,927 Persons against 2,476 Persons in Slovak Republic, a difference of 132,451 Persons.

That makes United States of America's figure about 54.5 times Slovak Republic's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, United States of America has been ahead every year.

Slovak Republic ranks 1st and United States of America ranks 2nd of 2 groups.

United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Slovak Republic United States of America Difference Ahead
1990s 1,954 Persons 104,970 Persons 103,016 Persons United States of America
2000s 2,162 Persons 115,842 Persons 113,680 Persons United States of America
2010s 2,301 Persons 120,450 Persons 118,148 Persons United States of America
2020s 2,478 Persons 130,823 Persons 128,345 Persons United States of America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher full-time and part-time employment based on national definition, Slovak Republic or United States of America?
United States of America, at 134,927 Persons against 2,476 Persons in Slovak Republic as of 2025.
What is the difference in full-time and part-time employment based on national definition between Slovak Republic and United States of America?
132,451 Persons, with United States of America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Slovak Republic and United States of America?
32 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2025.
How do Slovak Republic and United States of America rank globally for full-time and part-time employment based on national definition?
Slovak Republic ranks 1st and United States of America ranks 2nd of 2 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Full-time and part-time employment based on national definition. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Slovak Republic vs United States of America: Full-time and part-time employment based on national definition. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/full-time-and-part-time-employment-based-on-national-definition/slovak-republic-2/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/full-time-and-part-time-employment-based-on-national-definition/slovak-republic-2/united-states/">Slovak Republic vs United States of America: Full-time and part-time employment based on national definition</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Full-time and part-time employment based on national definition
Unit
Persons
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
53 places, 1,842 data points, 1966–2025
Last refreshed

This dataset contains data on full-time and part-time employment based on national definition. Data are broken down by professional status - employees, total employment - sex and standardised age groups (15-24, 25-54, 55+, total). National definitions of part-time work vary considerably across OECD countries. Essentially three main approaches can be distinguished: i) a classification based on the worker’s perception of his/her employment situation; ii) a cut-off (generally 30 or 35 hours per week) based on usual working hours, with persons usually working fewer hours being considered part-timers; iii) a comparable cut-off based on actual hours worked during the reference week. A criterion based on actual hours will generally yield a part-time rate higher than one based on usual hours, particularly if there are temporary reductions in working time as a result of holidays, illness, short-timing, etc. On the other hand, it is not entirely clear whether a classification based on the worker’s perception will necessarily yield estimates of part-time work that are higher or lower than one based on a fixed cut-off. In one country (France) which changed from 1981 to 1982 from a definition based on an actual hours cut-off (30 hours) to one based on the respondent’s perception, the latter criterion appeared to produce slightly higher estimates. Other factors as well affect the international comparability of the estimates. In some countries, the hours’ cut-off is based on hours for the main job, in others on total hours for all jobs. Certain countries do not consider unpaid family workers to be employed unless they work more than a minimum number of hours, so that such workers do not enter into counts for part-time workers. In order to facilitate analysis and comparisons over time, historical data for OECD members have been provided over as long a period as possible, often even before a country became a member of the Organisation. Information on the membership dates of all OECD countries can be found at OECD Ratification Dates. For detailed information on labour force surveys for all countries please see LFS_NOTES_SOURCES.