Ireland vs New Zealand: Full-time and part-time employment based on national definition

Ireland
2,080 Persons
in 2025
New Zealand
2,292 Persons
in 2025
Ireland rank
33rd
New Zealand rank
30th

Full-time and part-time employment based on national definition over time

  • Ireland
  • New Zealand
5001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k198320042025

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 2,292 Persons against 2,080 Persons in Ireland, a difference of 212 Persons.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Ireland's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 40 shared years of data; in 1986 it was New Zealand ahead.

Ireland ranks 33rd and New Zealand ranks 30th of 40 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ireland New Zealand Difference Ahead
1980s 1,007 Persons 1,279 Persons 272.34 Persons New Zealand
1990s 1,126 Persons 1,262 Persons 136.55 Persons New Zealand
2000s 1,451 Persons 1,573 Persons 121.7 Persons New Zealand
2010s 1,523 Persons 1,871 Persons 348.3 Persons New Zealand
2020s 1,912 Persons 2,268 Persons 356.45 Persons New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher full-time and part-time employment based on national definition, Ireland or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 2,292 Persons against 2,080 Persons in Ireland as of 2025.
What is the difference in full-time and part-time employment based on national definition between Ireland and New Zealand?
212 Persons, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and New Zealand?
40 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2025.
How do Ireland and New Zealand rank globally for full-time and part-time employment based on national definition?
Ireland ranks 33rd and New Zealand ranks 30th of 40 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Full-time and part-time employment based on national definition. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ireland vs New Zealand: Full-time and part-time employment based on national definition. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/full-time-and-part-time-employment-based-on-national-definition/ireland/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/full-time-and-part-time-employment-based-on-national-definition/ireland/new-zealand/">Ireland vs New Zealand: Full-time and part-time employment based on national definition</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Full-time and part-time employment based on national definition
Unit
Persons
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
53 places, 1,842 data points, 1966–2025
Last refreshed

This dataset contains data on full-time and part-time employment based on national definition. Data are broken down by professional status - employees, total employment - sex and standardised age groups (15-24, 25-54, 55+, total). National definitions of part-time work vary considerably across OECD countries. Essentially three main approaches can be distinguished: i) a classification based on the worker’s perception of his/her employment situation; ii) a cut-off (generally 30 or 35 hours per week) based on usual working hours, with persons usually working fewer hours being considered part-timers; iii) a comparable cut-off based on actual hours worked during the reference week. A criterion based on actual hours will generally yield a part-time rate higher than one based on usual hours, particularly if there are temporary reductions in working time as a result of holidays, illness, short-timing, etc. On the other hand, it is not entirely clear whether a classification based on the worker’s perception will necessarily yield estimates of part-time work that are higher or lower than one based on a fixed cut-off. In one country (France) which changed from 1981 to 1982 from a definition based on an actual hours cut-off (30 hours) to one based on the respondent’s perception, the latter criterion appeared to produce slightly higher estimates. Other factors as well affect the international comparability of the estimates. In some countries, the hours’ cut-off is based on hours for the main job, in others on total hours for all jobs. Certain countries do not consider unpaid family workers to be employed unless they work more than a minimum number of hours, so that such workers do not enter into counts for part-time workers. In order to facilitate analysis and comparisons over time, historical data for OECD members have been provided over as long a period as possible, often even before a country became a member of the Organisation. Information on the membership dates of all OECD countries can be found at OECD Ratification Dates. For detailed information on labour force surveys for all countries please see LFS_NOTES_SOURCES.